Crypterum Crypto Exchange Review: Fees, Status, and Why It’s No Longer Viable
Crypterum Fee Calculator
Crypterum Fee Overview
Crypterum offered a fixed maker-taker fee structure of 0.10% and 0.20% respectively, with a flat 0.0003 BTC withdrawal fee. This calculator helps estimate how much you'd pay on Crypterum vs. top exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase.
Estimated Costs
Fee Comparison Table
| Exchange | Maker Fee | Taker Fee | BTC Withdrawal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypterum | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.0003 BTC |
| Binance | 0.00% - 0.10% | 0.00% - 0.10% | 0.0005 BTC |
| Kraken | 0.00% - 0.16% | 0.00% - 0.26% | 0.0004 BTC |
| Coinbase | 0.00% - 0.50% | 0.00% - 0.50% | 0.0006 BTC |
Looking for a low‑fee crypto broker? You might have stumbled on Crypterum, a once‑promising exchange that advertised sub‑0.2% trading costs. The catch? The platform has been flagged as inactive since early 2025, meaning you can’t actually place a trade today. This review breaks down what Crypterum offered, why its fee model looked good on paper, and why its shutdown matters for anyone hunting a reliable exchange.
Key Takeaways
- Cryerum operated on a maker‑taker model with 0.10% maker and 0.20% taker fees - cheaper than most major platforms.
- Bitcoin withdrawals cost 0.0003BTC, roughly half the industry average.
- The exchange was run by Agreados LTD in Cyprus but is now listed as inactive by Cryptowisser.
- Limited coin support, scarce community feedback, and no active customer service make it unsuitable for new users.
- Consider active alternatives like Binance, Kraken, or Coinbase that combine low fees with regulatory compliance.
Crypterum review aims to give you a realistic picture before you waste time on a dead platform.
What Was Crypterum?
When it was active, Crypterum was a cryptocurrency exchange based in Cyprus, operated by Agreados LTD. The service targeted cost‑conscious traders, especially those who moved large volumes daily. Its marketing highlighted a simple fee schedule and fast Bitcoin withdrawals, but the platform never reached the visibility of giants like Binance or Coinbase.
Fee Structure Explained
Cryptocurrency exchanges typically charge two kinds of fees: a maker fee for orders that add liquidity to the order book and a taker fee for orders that remove liquidity. Crypterum used a classic maker‑taker model:
- Maker fee: 0.10% of the trade value.
- Taker fee: 0.20% of the trade value.
To put those numbers in perspective, a 10BTC market buy would cost 0.02BTC in taker fees - less than the 0.0217BTC average across the industry in 2025. Crypterum also promised volume‑based discounts, but the exact tiers were never published, leaving traders guessing about deeper savings.
Withdrawal Costs
Bitcoin withdrawals were priced at a flat 0.0003BTC per transaction. Most exchanges charge around 0.0006BTC plus dynamic network fees, so Crypterum’s rate was about 50% cheaper. For frequent traders, that difference adds up quickly, especially on high‑frequency strategies.
How Crypterum Stacked Up Against the Big Players
| Exchange | Maker Fee | Taker Fee | BTC Withdrawal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypterum | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.0003BTC |
| Binance | 0.00% - 0.10% | 0.00% - 0.10% | 0.0005BTC |
| Kraken | 0.00% - 0.16% | 0.00% - 0.26% | 0.0004BTC |
| Coinbase | 0.00% - 0.50% | 0.00% - 0.50% | 0.0006BTC |
Statistically, Crypterum’s fixed percentages would have placed it in the low‑fee tier, especially for high‑volume traders. However, the exchange’s coin catalogue was never disclosed publicly, and its user base remained tiny - a stark contrast to Kraken’s 350+ assets or Binance’s 500+.
Why Crypterum Is Inactive
In early 2025, the review site Cryptowisser listed Crypterum as inactive. The platform stopped processing deposits, withdrawals, and order matching. No official statement was released, but a few clues point to the cause:
- Regulatory pressure: Cyprus follows the EU’s MiCA framework, demanding strong AML/KYC compliance. Smaller firms often lack the resources to meet evolving standards.
- Competitive squeeze: Larger exchanges offer token‑based fee rebates (e.g., Binance’s BNB discount) and deep liquidity, making Crypterum’s flat fee model less attractive.
- Operational costs: Maintaining secure custody, audit trails, and 24/7 support is expensive. Without a large user base, the economics quickly turn negative.
Because the exchange ceased operations, any remaining funds on Crypterum accounts are effectively stranded. Users who left assets there before the shutdown are advised to seek legal counsel or contact the Cyprus Financial Services Commission for guidance.
Regulatory Context: Cyprus and Crypto
Cyprus, as an EU member, adheres to the Markets in Crypto‑Assets (MiCA) regulation, which took effect in 2024. The law requires:
- Robust KYC/AML procedures.
- Segregated client funds.
- Regular audits by licensed auditors.
While Crypterum claimed compliance, the lack of a public audit report or licensing badge raised red flags. In contrast, exchanges like Binance have obtained licenses in multiple jurisdictions, providing an additional layer of trust.
What This Means for You
If you’re scanning the crypto market for a cheap fee structure, Crypterum is a dead end. The biggest lesson is that low fees shouldn’t eclipse fundamentals like:
- Active regulatory licensing.
- Transparent fee schedules with clear discount tiers.
- Responsive customer support and a vibrant community.
- Proven security audits and insurance coverage.
Platforms that meet these criteria-Binance, Kraken, Coinbase, Gemini-offer a blend of competitive pricing and operational stability.
How to Vet a New Exchange
Use this quick checklist before depositing any funds:
- Verify the exchange’s legal entity and jurisdiction. Look for registration numbers and licensing documentation.
- Check recent reviews from reputable sites (Cryptowisser, CoinMarketCap, Trustpilot).
- Inspect fee tables for both trading and withdrawals. Beware of hidden network fees.
- Confirm the availability of two‑factor authentication, cold‑storage, and proof of reserves.
- Assess community activity-Reddit threads, Discord channels, and official blog updates.
Following these steps cuts down the risk of ending up with an inactive or fraudulent platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Crypterum still operating?
No. Cryptowisser marked Crypterum as inactive in its 2025 review, and the exchange no longer processes deposits, withdrawals, or trades.
What were Crypterum’s trading fees?
The maker fee was 0.10% and the taker fee was 0.20% of the transaction value. Volume‑based discounts were mentioned but never publicly detailed.
How much did a Bitcoin withdrawal cost?
Crypterum charged a flat 0.0003BTC per Bitcoin withdrawal, about half the average fee charged by other exchanges in 2025.
Was Crypterum regulated?
The exchange was registered in Cyprus under Agreados LTD, but there is no public evidence of a MiCA license or third‑party audit, making its regulatory status uncertain.
Can I recover funds left on Crypterum?
Recovery is unlikely without an official declaration from the company. Users should contact the Cyprus Financial Services Commission and consider legal advice.
Which active exchanges offer similar low fees?
Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase all provide tiered fee structures that can dip below 0.10% for high‑volume traders, plus they maintain active regulatory compliance.
What should I look for in a secure crypto exchange?
Key factors include licensing, cold‑storage of assets, regular security audits, two‑factor authentication, transparent fee schedules, and an active user community.
Crypterum was a circus of promises, and the fees were the clown juggling my patience.
When they shut down, anyone who trusted their “fixed” rates got burned.
Reading the fee table feels like flipping through a relic of a bygone era, when optimism eclipsed due diligence.
The 0.10% maker fee once sounded like a bargain, yet the hidden costs were lurking in the fine print.
One could argue that the allure of a stable withdrawal amount masked liquidity fragility.
In hindsight, the platform’s silence on reserve health was a warning bell ignored by many.
While we mourn the loss of a potential competitor, the lesson is unmistakable: transparency trumps hype.
Future exchanges should learn that static fees are not a shield against market turbulence.
Ultimately, Crypterum’s downfall serves as a cautionary tale for anyone chasing low‑cost hype.
I felt for the users who got stuck with that flat withdrawal fee.
It’s a reminder to always check the fine print before diving in.
The exit fees alone make Crypterum a relic.
Looking at the numbers, Crypterum’s maker‑taker spread was marginally better than some big players.
However, the withdrawal fee of 0.0003 BTC translates to a noticeable cost during price spikes.
For traders with thin margins, that extra outlay erodes profitability faster than expected.
In short, the fee advantage was quickly outweighed by operational risk.
It’s fascinating, really, how Crypterum marketed itself as a “fixed‑fee” sanctuary, yet the market reality was anything but static!
Users were lured by the promise of simplicity, but beneath that veneer lay a complex web of liquidity constraints, regulatory gray areas, and hidden overheads.
The withdrawal surcharge, while seemingly modest, compounded over multiple transactions, creating a cumulative drain that many overlooked.
When the platform vanished, the aftermath revealed not just financial loss, but also a breach of trust that reverberated across forums.
One must ask, how many other “stable” fee structures are merely smoke and mirrors?
But the real issue was the lack of transparency in their liquidity pools.
Oh, Crypterum, the underdog that flew too close to the sun.
At least the fees looked cute on paper 😂.
Now we have a nice case study for “don’t trust the hype”.
Good thing we have better options now!
I remember when Crypterum first popped up, it seemed like a fresh breeze in the crypto market.
But the promised low fees turned out to be just a marketing gimmick.
Their UI was slick, yet underneath there were hidden costs that users only spotted after weeks.
Also, the community support was almost non‑existent, making it hard to get help.
When the exchange went dark, many were left chasing their funds with no roadmap.
Lesson learned: flashy front‑ends can hide serious backend issues.
Sure, Crypterum’s “fixed” fees were the silver bullet for every trader.
Until they vanished, and the only thing fixed was the fact that nobody saw it coming.
I appreciate the detailed fee breakdown you’ve shared; it really clarifies where the hidden costs lie.
For anyone still skeptical, looking at the withdrawal numbers tells the whole story.
Let’s keep highlighting these pitfalls so future platforms stay accountable.
Totally feel you on the disappointment 🙁.
The whole thing was a rollercoaster, and the ending was just plain sad.
Hope the next exchange treats its users better! 😊
Did anyone consider that Crypterum’s sudden shutdown was orchestrated by larger players scared of competition?
Maybe the “inactive” label is just a cover for a deeper pull‑back.
When Crypterum first emerged, its promise of a crystal‑clear fee schedule was like a siren song to traders yearning for predictability.
The 0.10% maker fee glittered against the backdrop of volatile market spreads, suggesting a sanctuary of stability.
Yet, beneath that polished veneer, the exchange was wrestling with thin order books, a fact that seasoned market‑makers could sense immediately.
Liquidity providers, who are the lifeblood of any honest platform, found themselves sidelined as Crypterum hoarded depth for its own advantage.
The withdrawal fee of 0.0003 BTC, while seemingly minuscule, became a tyrant when multiplied across dozens of transactions during price spikes.
As the crypto winter deepened, the exchange’s cushion of capital began to erode, exposing cracks that the community could no longer ignore.
Users started posting on forums, sharing personal anecdotes of delayed withdrawals and unresponsive support tickets.
What began as isolated complaints snowballed into a chorus of discontent that echoed across social media.
Eventually, the inevitable happened: Crypterum announced its inactivity, leaving a trail of frozen assets and shattered expectations.
This episode underscores a timeless truth in the digital asset arena: alluring fee structures cannot compensate for weak governance.
Regulatory compliance, transparent reserve reporting, and robust risk management are the real pillars of longevity.
For newcomers eyeing low‑cost exchanges, the lesson is stark-do your homework beyond the headline numbers.
Scrutinize the depth of liquidity, the health of the balance sheet, and the responsiveness of the support team.
Only then can you avoid being caught in the fallout of another “too‑good‑to‑be‑true” platform.
In the end, Crypterum’s story will be cited in future whitepapers as a cautionary tale, reminding us that the crypto world rewards substance over sparkle.
Crypterum tried to cape itself as a low‑fee hero, but the execution fell flat.
The community’s vigilance in dissecting Crypterum’s fee model is commendable.
By sharing transparent calculations, we empower others to make informed decisions.
Let’s continue this collaborative effort to hold exchanges accountable.
Honestly, I’m not surprised Crypterum folded; hype always outpaces substance.
While some mourn the loss, I see it as a natural purge of unsustainable projects.
Better to have fewer, sturdier platforms than a sea of fleeting gimmicks.
One could argue that Crypterum’s demise was preordained by its own overconfidence in static fees.
The platform’s refusal to adapt to market turbulence reflected a deeper philosophical flaw: believing that numbers alone can guarantee resilience.
When the liquidity dried up, the fixed‑fee promise turned into a brittle shell, cracking under pressure.
Such an outcome illustrates the perils of ignoring dynamic risk assessments in favor of headline‑grabbing statistics.
Moreover, the silence from the team during the crisis amplified distrust, fueling speculation about hidden agendas.
In retrospect, the whole saga serves as a stark reminder that transparency, adaptability, and community engagement are non‑negotiable pillars for any exchange.
Future projects would do well to internalize these lessons before courting eager traders with glossy fee charts.
Otherwise, they risk joining the growing list of crypto casualties.